基于物探电法及示踪试验判定煤矿涌水来源试验研究

    Experimental study on determining the source of water gushing in coal mine based on geophysical prospecting method and tracer test

    • 摘要: 本文针对山西和顺天池煤矿井下涌水来源不明问题,通过野外示踪试验,开展了井下监测及取样室内测试分析,查明了地表水文孔区域与井下出水点之间的水力连通状况。同时采用高密度电阻率法和激发极化法,暴雨前后在矿区地表边界开展测试,通过对比反演结果推断涌水异常通道。结果表明,主井出水点氯离子浓度整体趋势虽缓慢上升,但是变化幅度较小,约20 mg/L左右。轨道大巷出水点氯离子浓度较稳定,变化幅度约10 mg/L左右。现场及室内测试结果均显示2处出水点水样的电导率整体均呈现逐渐下降趋势,未见波峰出现。因此,判断地表水文孔区域与2处井下出水点之间不存在明显水力联系。推测原因为井下出水点的水源另有源头,或前期注浆形成较高防水帷幕拦截了示踪剂溶液而无法到达井下出水点。暴雨前后的高密度电阻率法和高密度激发极化法对比显示,下雨前后注浆段煤层电阻率差异较小,代表注浆段隔水性能整体较好。断面内存在3处低阻异常,且下雨后电阻率进一步降低,结合示踪试验判定YC-1处通道对矿井涌水量影响较小,后期应进一步查明YC-2及YC-3的渗水情况。

       

      Abstract: Aiming at the unknown source of underground water gushing in Tianchi coal mine in Shanxi Province, this paper carried out underground monitoring and sampling laboratory test analysis through field tracing test, and found out the hydraulic connectivity between the surface hydrologic hole area and the underground water outlet point. At the same time, the high density resistivity method and the induced polarization method were used to test the surface boundary of the mining area before and after the rainstorm, and the abnormal water gushing channel was inferred by comparing the inversion results. The results show that the overall trend of chloride ion concentration at the outlet point of the main well increases slowly, but the change range is small, about 20 mg/L. The chloride ion concentration at the outlet point of the track roadway is stable, and the variation range is about 10 mg/L. Both on-site and indoor test results showed that the overall conductivity of the water samples at the two outlet points showed a gradual decline trend, and no wave peak appeared. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no obvious hydraulic relationship between the surface hydrologic hole area and the two underground water discharge points. It is speculated that the reason is that the water source of the underground outlet has another source, or the high waterproof curtain formed by grouting in the early stage blocked the tracer solution and could not reach the underground outlet. The comparison between the high density resistivity method and the high density induced polarization method before and after heavy rain shows that the coal seam resistivity difference before and after rain is small, which means that the water insulation performance of the grouting section is good. There are three low-resistance anomalies in the section, and the resistivity is further reduced after rain. Combined with the tracer test, it is determined that the YC-1 channel has little influence on the mine water inflow, and the water seepage of YC-2 and YC-3 should be further identified in the later stage.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回